|
Allowing Cameroonian Citizens Abroad to Vote is Not
Enough to Guarantee Free, Fair, and Transparent
Elections
CCDHR
welcomes the recent effort by the Government of
Cameroon to grant voting rights to Cameroonian
citizens abroad but condemns the narrow and
fraudulent context within which such voting rights
will be exercised. The effort to grant Cameroonians
abroad the ability to chose who becomes the
President of their motherland may at face value
appear to be a good move by the Government of
Cameroon, but this effort falls far short of
satisfying the demands and needs of the Cameroonian
Diaspora. The absence of concurrent measures to
reform the electoral system, the electoral
management body, and the continued denial of dual
nationality to Cameroonians makes the current move
nothing more than a calculated attempt to extend
election fraud beyond the boards of Cameroon.
But who is a Cameroonian abroad and what does the term
Cameroonian Diaspora actually mean? CCDHR maintains
that every Cameroonian by birth, marriage, and
naturalization should have and retain at anytime all
the rights and privileges associated with being a
Cameroonian national, irrespective of any other
nationality that such individual may eventually
acquire. However, Cameroon’s nationality laws
provides otherwise. According to Cameroonian law,
any Cameroonian who willingly acquires the
citizenship of another nation shall automatically
lose their Cameroonian nationality. This dictates
that any Cameroonian immigrant who becomes a
naturalized citizen of a foreign country
automatically loses their Cameroonian nationality. CCDHR therefore notes that beyond giving them the
right to vote, Cameroonians in the Diaspora are more
interested in Dual Nationality and the establishment
of an Independent Electoral Commission, not a
calculated Machiavellian maneuver to stuff ballot
boxes in Cameroonian Embassies abroad to swell up
the margin of victory for Paul Biya.
An
investigation concluded by the CCDHR in May 2011
revealed that many militants of the ruling Cameroon
Peoples Democratic Movement (CPDM) in the United
States, including the Presidents and executives of
the various CPDM sections, subsections, and branches
have acquired US citizenship. However, these people
maintain strong militancy within Cameroon’s ruling
party and continue to enjoy all the privileges of
being Cameroonian despite taking up foreign
nationality. They get Cameroonian passports for
themselves and family, and receive other services
and scholarships only available to Cameroonian
citizens with relative ease. How the Government of
Cameroon allows such interference in the domestic
affairs of Cameroon by people who would otherwise be
considered foreigners (if they were of the
opposition or civil society) is questionable, but
not surprising.
CPDM
militants abroad who have acquired foreign
nationalities are allowed to function as Cameroonians
because they promote the ideology of the CPDM
party, they support the continued oppression of the
People of Cameroon by their government, and assist
in the looting of the nation's resources. On the
other hand, members of opposition political parties
and the civil society abroad who criticize the
tyranny of the Government of Cameroon are placed
under secret
surveillance, systematically castigated, refused services by Cameroon Embassies, and classified as
foreigners for acquiring the nationalities of their
host countries. This double standard in the treatment
of Cameroonians abroad based on party affiliation
has been a cornerstone policy of Cameroon’s
diplomatic missions for the past decade based
on specific instructions from the Presidency of
the Republic on the advise of a joint recommendation of
CPDM party militants abroad, the Ministry of External
Relations, and
the Ministry of Territorial Administration and
Decentralization.
Given
that votes from Cameroonians at home have meant
nothing to the eventual outcome of elections in
Cameroon for the past 50 years, it is doubtful that
votes from Cameroonians abroad would have any impact
without a complete overhaul of the Cameroon
electoral system itself. According to the new law
granting Cameroonian citizens abroad the right to
vote in general elections, the same
government that will manage the conduct of elections
at home will be managing the conduct of elections
abroad. Meanwhile, Cameroonians abroad are called
upon to trust their votes with government
representatives
that continued to deny them passports and other
services, report them to immigration authorities,
and work
assiduously to
inhibit their survival in their host countries just because
they criticize the autocracy of the Government of
Cameroon.
It appears more plausible to conclude that with all its
known undemocratic tendencies, the Government of
Cameroon would not have succumbed to the decades
long call for Cameroonians abroad to be able to vote
during elections, if it were not certain about its
strategies to circumvent such votes to its advantage
as it has consistently and successfully done to the
votes cast by Cameroonians at home. CCDHR therefore
holds that until Cameroonians are granted the
ability to maintain dual, if not multiple
citizenship; until the Government of Cameroon stops
experimenting and creates a truly independent
electoral Commission; until the role of the Ministry
of Territorial Administration and Decentralization
in the conduct and supervision of elections is
completely eliminated; and until the proclamation of
election results becomes the prerogative of an
independent electoral commission, the granting of
voting rights to Cameroonians abroad will be
inconsequential. |